Agenda

  • Congress vs. Parliament, and Who Serves

  • The Framers’ Design: Federalist 55 and 62

  • Congressional Powers

  • Congressional Elections and Redistricting

  • Representation in the Senate

  • Representation

  • Congressional Organization

  • Electoral Incentives

  • Performance and Reform

Congressional Approval

Congressional Reelection Rates

The Congress

  • Congress heads the legislative branch of government, comprised of the House of Representatives and the Senate
  • Bicameralism: The practice of having two legislative chambers
  • Important functions of Congress:
    • Lawmaking
    • Represent the views of constituents
    • Be of service to constituents in dealings with the national government
    • Provide oversight of the actions of the president and his administration

Congress versus Parliament

Congress

  • Runs for the party nomination, but voters ultimately decide
  • Members have individual, independent power
  • Robust staff and resources

Parliament

  • Selected by the political party to be placed on the ballot
  • Power is mostly group-based, rather than individual
  • Fewer resources and staff

The Framers’ Design

The Congress

Federalist No. 51

In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates

The Congress

  • Designed to be a deliberative body
  • Represents various interests
    • States (Senate)
    • The People (House)
  • Balancing competing interests
    • Small states and big states

How Large Should the House Be?

Federalist No. 55

  • Anti-Federalists attacked the proposed House of only 65 members. They said it would:
    • Be too small to be trusted with the public interest
    • Not know the local circumstances of its many constituents
    • Be drawn from an elite aiming at “a permanent elevation of the few on the depression of the many”
    • Grow more disproportionate as the population grew
  • Madison’s reply: “No political problem is less susceptible of a precise solution”

Federalist No. 55

A Floor and a Ceiling

  • Too small: risks “too easy a combination for improper purposes” and loses “free consultation and discussion”
  • Too large: produces “the confusion and intemperance of a multitude”
  • 60–70 members are safer than 6 or 7, but 600–700 are not proportionally better
  • At 6,000–7,000, “the whole reasoning ought to be reversed”
  • The problem is size itself, not the character of the members

Federalist No. 55

In all very numerous assemblies, of whatever character composed, passion never fails to wrest the sceptre from reason. Had every Athenian citizen been a Socrates, every Athenian assembly would still have been a mob

Why a Senate?

Federalist No. 62

  • The Articles of Confederation had a single-chamber legislature — the case for a second chamber had to be made
  • Higher qualifications (age 30; nine years a citizen): the “senatorial trust” requires “greater extent of information and stability of character”
  • Selection by state legislatures: favors “a select appointment” and gives state governments an “agency” in the federal government
  • Equal state representation: a compromise between large and small states
  • Stability: frequent turnover (“mutability in the public councils”) calls for “some stable institution in the government”

Federalist No. 62

…the propensity of all single and numerous assemblies, to yield to the impulse of sudden and violent passions, and to be seduced by factious leaders into intemperate and pernicious resolutions

  • The cure: a body that is less numerous and holds office “by a tenure of considerable duration”

Size, Tenure, and Deliberation

Federalist 55 and 62 Together

House Senate
Members 435 100
Term 2 years 6 years, staggered
Minimum age 25 30
Original selection The people State legislatures
Role for Madison The popular branch “Coolness,” “system,” “wisdom”
  • Deliberation depends on institutional design, not only on the character of members

Congressional Powers

The Powers of Congress

  • Enumerated powers:
    • Power explicitly stated in the Constitution, Article I Section 8

Declare war

Impose taxes

Coin and regulate currency

Regulate foreign and interstate commerce

Raise and maintain an army and a navy

Maintain a post office

Make laws regulating the naturalization of immigrants

The Powers of Congress

  • Implied powers:
    • Powers not specifically detailed in the Constitution but inferred as necessary to achieve the objectives of the national government
    • Elastic clause:
      • To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof
      • Allows Congress to pass all laws that are “necessary and proper” to carry out enumerated powers

The Legislative Process

Article I Section 7

The Legislative Process

Article I Section 7

The Legislative Process

Article I Section 7

  • Bill proposals

    • Only legislators can introduce bills
    • Beyond bills: simple, concurrent, and joint resolutions
  • Bills referred to proper committee based on jurisdiction and party goals

  • Committee action

    • Most bills not acted on in committee
    • Committees can choose to mark up bills for the floor

The Legislative Process

Article I Section 7

  • House Rules Committee uses special rules to bring bills to the floor
    • Open rules
    • Closed rules
    • Restricted or modified rules
  • Senate uses unanimous consent agreements to bring bills to floor
    • Unlimited debate enables the filibuster
    • Ending debate requires cloture — 60 votes
    • Empowers individual senators

The Legislative Process

Article I Section 7

  • Enrolled bills sent to president
    • Sign, veto, or pocket veto
  • House and Senate can override veto
    • Two-thirds majority in both chambers
  • Separation of powers system creates bias against action

Organization

Party Control

Political Parties in Government

  • Members organize themselves into party coalitions in the House and Senate called a caucus (Democrats) or a conference (Republicans)
  • Members choose leadership (Speaker, Majority Leader, Minority Leader, Whips)
  • Members empower party leaders to influence the agenda and manage legislation

Congressional Caucuses

  • Beyond party caucuses/conferences, members also form issue-based caucuses: an association of congressional members created to advance a political ideology or a regional, ethnic, or economic interest

  • Ideological: e.g., Medicare for All Caucus

  • Regional: e.g., Northeast-Midwest Congressional Coalition

  • Issue-specific: e.g., Congressional Diabetes Caucus

  • Race/ethnicity-based: e.g., Congressional Black Caucus

Congressional Leadership: The House

  • Speaker of the House

  • The majority leader

  • Minority leader

  • Whips

Three powerful Speakers of the House: Thomas B. Reed, Joseph G. Cannon, and Sam Rayburn.

Congressional Leadership: The Senate

  • The Vice-President

  • President pro tempore: Longest severing member of the majority party

  • Majority leader

  • Minority leader

  • Whips

The Committee System

  • Each committee focuses on and has jurisdiction within a particular area of policy

    • Allows for specialization and expertise in committees
    • Also allows self-selection for members
  • Standing committees

  • Special/select committees

  • Joint committees

  • Conference committees

Standing Committees

Representation

Representation Defined

  • An elected leader’s looking out for his or her constituents while carrying out the duties of the office

  • Styles

    • Representational: members believe they primarily represent their constituents
    • Organizational: members take cues from their colleagues and party
    • Attitudinal: members also often lead with their own viewpoints

Forms of Representation

Descriptive: rooted in the racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, gender, and sexual identity of the representatives themselves

Elections

Congressional Elections

The House of Representatives; Article I Section 2

  • Elected every two years
  • Must be 25 years old
  • Based on population
    • Three-fifths compromise
    • Originally 1 for every 30,000; now ~800,000
    • Capped at 435 members in 1929
  • States decide district boundaries
  • Single member districts; plurality of votes

Has the House Outgrown Madison?

  • Federalist 55’s fourth objection: the House would grow more disproportionate as the population grew
  • 1790: one representative for every 34,436 people
  • 1929: House size capped at 435
  • 2020: one representative for every ~762,000 people <!–
  • Would a larger House improve representation — or bring back Madison’s “confusion and intemperance of a multitude”? –>

Congressional Elections

Number of representatives per state determined every 10 years following the Census

Gerrymandering

Gerrymandering

  • Manipulative dividing of election district boundaries to give majority advantage to one party

  • Packing: Cramming as many opposition voters as possible into one district

  • Cracking: Splitting a concentrated group of opposition voters across multiple districts so they’re a minority in each one

Gerrymandering

Gerrymandering

What Counts as a Gerrymander?

  • Common definition: drawing lines to give a party an unfair advantage — but what is “unfair”?
State How the map was drawn Result
California (2020–26) Independent commission, no political data Democrats: ~60% of votes, 75–83% of seats
Massachusetts GOP voters spread evenly statewide Republicans: ~40% of votes, no House seat since 1994
Texas Legislature, used political data Republicans: ~66% of seats — a smaller bonus than California’s
Indiana Compact, regular-looking map Democrats: ~40% of votes, 23% of seats

Who Polices Gerrymandering?

  • Racial gerrymandering: challenged in federal court under the Equal Protection Clause and the Voting Rights Act
  • Partisan gerrymandering: Rucho v. Common Cause (2019) — a nonjusticiable political question for federal courts
  • Remedies for partisan maps are left to:
    • State courts and state constitutions
    • Independent redistricting commissions
    • Congress
  • Where race and party overlap, the line blurs: Alexander v. South Carolina NAACP (2024) lets states defend a map by claiming partisan intent

Mid-Decade Redistricting

Ahead of the 2026 Midterms

  • States normally redraw congressional maps only once per decade, after the census
  • Since July 2025, a wave of mid-decade redistricting has redrawn maps in states on both sides of the aisle
  • Before 2025, only two states had voluntarily redistricted mid-decade since 1970
  • By September 2026, ten states had new congressional maps — some voluntary, some required by law, some ordered by courts

Mid-Decade Redistricting

The Numbers

State Driver Net Partisan Effect
Texas Voluntary (legislature) +5 R
California Voluntary (commission) +5 D
Florida Voluntary (legislature) +4 R
Ohio Required by state law +2 R
Utah Litigation +1 D
AL, LA, MO, NC, TN Voluntary / litigation +1 R each

Net: +10 Republican-favorable seats nationwide, as of Sept. 2026

Representation in the Senate

Congressional Elections

The Senate; Article I Section 3

  • Two from each state
  • Elected every six years
  • Originally appointed by state legislatures
    • Seventeenth Amendment (1913)
  • Must be 30 years old

The Great Compromise

  • Virginia Plan: representation based on population (favored large states)
  • New Jersey Plan: equal representation for every state (favored small states)
  • Compromise: House by population, Senate with two per state
  • Madison (Fed. 62): the equal vote is “a constitutional recognition of the portion of sovereignty remaining in the individual states, and an instrument for preserving that residuary sovereignty”
  • The Senate represents states as states — federalism

A Double Majority

  • Every law needs “a majority of the people, and then, of a majority of the states”
  • Madison admits this check “may, in some instances, be injurious as well as beneficial”
  • But “the facility and excess of law-making seem to be the diseases to which our governments are most liable”
  • Bicameralism adds one more veto point — another source of the system’s bias against action

The Seventeenth Amendment (1913)

  • Framers: state legislatures choose senators — a “select appointment” and a voice for state governments
  • After the Civil War, problems mounted:
    • Reporters accused legislatures of taking bribes to elect senators friendly to special interests
    • Deadlocked legislatures left states without full Senate representation for months or years
  • Reformers’ answer: direct popular election
  • The only major change to the framers’ Senate design

Equal States, Unequal People

Wyoming

588,753 people

2 senators

California

~39.6 million people

2 senators

  • A Wyoming resident has roughly 67 times the Senate weight of a Californian
  • Defenders: protects small states and federalism; cools majority passion
  • Critics: “minority rule” — senators representing a minority of Americans can form a Senate majority

Electoral Incentives

Why Incentives Matter

  • Members of Congress are rational actors who put reelection first
  • Then how elections are run shapes what members do in office
  • The framers balanced two goals:
    • Two-year House terms keep members accountable
    • Six-year Senate terms insulate members from “sudden and violent passions” (Fed. 62)
  • Did they get the balance right for a modern Congress?

The Never-Ending Campaign

  • House members face voters every two years; one-third of the Senate is always up
  • The U.S. sets no limit on how long campaigns last
    • United Kingdom: about 25 working days
    • Japan: about 12 days
  • Congressional working days have declined since the mid-1990s
  • Both chambers sharply cut time in Washington in election-year Octobers and Novembers

The Rising Cost of Campaigns

Average incumbent spending (inflation-adjusted)

1986 2024
House $1.06 million $2.7 million
Senate $9.03 million $25.6 million
  • By some estimates, members spend more hours on donor calls than on committee and floor work combined
  • Heavy reliance on large donors is associated with fewer bills introduced, speeches given, and hearings attended

Primaries and Safe Seats

  • Fewer than 20% of voters cast primary ballots
  • In 2022, 8% of voters effectively decided 83% of House races
  • Primary voters skew older, whiter, and more partisan
  • Competitive House districts: 164 (37.7%) in 1997 → 42 (9.7%) in 2026
  • States with split-party Senate delegations: 27 in 1980 → 4 today
  • In a safe seat, the only real threat is the primary — which rewards party loyalty over compromise

Insecure Majorities

  • 1933–1994: long stretches of one-party control of Congress
  • Since the mid-1990s (House) and early 1980s (Senate): control can flip almost every election
  • Every election is a fight for the majority, so party leaders:
    • Tightly control the floor agenda
    • Allow fewer amendments
    • Protect vulnerable members and stress party unity
  • 2025: about 70% of House votes and 94% of Senate votes split along party lines

Safe but Insecure

  • Reelection rates are very high: House 91–97%, Senate 95–98% in recent cycles
  • Yet members act as if they are always vulnerable. Richard Fenno: members always find “reasons to feel insecure”
  • Low-risk substitutes for hard lawmaking:
    • Casework for constituents
    • Pork-barrel spending for the district
    • Symbolic position-taking: commemorative resolutions, bills with no chance of passing
  • Example: in 2026, Sen. John Cornyn introduced a bill to rename a highway after President Trump ahead of a primary — which he lost

Are Incentives the Whole Story?

  • Electoral incentives are one factor among several:
    • A fragmented media environment
    • Congress’s limited staff and institutional capacity
    • Growth of unilateral executive power
  • Congress still passes many low-profile, bipartisan bills each year
  • Judging Congress requires a view of what a “well-functioning Congress” should do